Study in Canada

study in canada img

A hassle-free visa process, affordable tuition fees, and highly-ranked universities are some of the many reasons why Canada is the most sought-after study-abroad destination.

Study in Australia

Study in Australia img

Every year over 637,000 International students choose to study in Australia for a variety of reasons such as the availability of several undergraduate, postgraduate, and part-time work programs.

More Countries

Canada Flag (1)
Universities in Canada
UK Flag (3)
Universities in UK
USA Flag (1)
Universities in USA
Australia Flag
Universities in Australia
Germany Flag (1)
Universities in Germany
Ireland Flag
Universities in Ireland
France Flag
Universities in France
New Zealand Logo
Universities in New Zealand

MSM Monitor Report: The Future of UK International
Student Visas After 2024

The United Kingdom has long been recognized as a global leader in higher education, attracting international students with its world-class universities, robust academic ecosystem, and post-study work opportunities. However, the international student visa landscape in the UK has undergone a notable shift following a series of immigration policy reforms in 2024.

In particular, the government’s decision to prohibit dependants from accompanying most taught postgraduate students triggered a substantial decline in visa applications from countries like India and Nigeria, markets that previously accounted for a significant share of inbound international students. Rising cost-of-living pressures and student housing shortages further complicated the outlook.
According to official Home Office data, the UK issued 393,000 main applicant study visas in 2024, reflecting a 14% year-over-year decline. By January 2025, early recovery signs emerged: 411,100 visas had already been granted, indicating a 4.6% rebound from the previous year-end figure. Despite this tentative stabilization, structural barriers such as housing costs and heavy market reliance on a few countries remain critical vulnerabilities.
This MSM Monitor white paper analyzes UK study visa trends from 2018 through early 2025, offering an evidence-backed perspective on source country shifts, housing infrastructure gaps, competitor country policies, Brexit implications, and strategies to future-proof the UK’s international education sector. Key sections also include a deep dive into Commonwealth country mobility and a forecast of likely visa trajectories heading into 2026.

UK Study Visa Trends: 2018–2025

The five-year trajectory of UK international student visa issuance has been defined by sharp ebbs and flows, closely tied to global disruptions, domestic policy moves, and competitive positioning among leading education destinations.

Between 2018 and 2019, UK student visa numbers were already on an upward trend, buoyed by the UK’s longstanding reputation and pre-Brexit attractiveness for EU and Commonwealth students alike. However, the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 led to a sharp contraction in international student mobility worldwide. Visa issuance in the UK plummeted in 2020, but this was followed by a steep recovery in 2021, catalyzed by the introduction of the Graduate Route in July 2021, which allows international students to stay and work in the UK for up to two years after graduation (three years for doctoral graduates).

In 2022, the UK hit a record high: 486,000 main applicant study visas were issued—a clear sign of renewed confidence in the UK’s education system. This growth was particularly pronounced among postgraduate taught (PGT) students, with a large proportion coming from South Asian and African countries. However, by late 2023, concerns over net migration figures prompted the UK government to reassess its approach.

The most consequential policy change came into effect in January 2024, when the UK implemented a ban on dependants for most non-research international students. This led to immediate and measurable declines in visa applications, especially from source countries where family accompaniment is a key decision-making factor.

By the end of 2024, main applicant visa numbers had declined to 393,000, representing a 14% year-over-year drop. However, Home Office data from early 2025 offers cause for cautious optimism: 411,100 study visas had already been issued by January, representing a 4.6% recovery over year-end 2024 numbers.

In parallel, dependant visa applications plummeted by 84%, confirming that the policy had the intended effect- albeit with unintended consequences for institutions reliant on markets with traditionally high dependant-to-student ratios.

Moreover, it’s worth noting that the UK maintained a visa rejection rate of only 3–5% in early 2025, showcasing its administrative efficiency and relatively high approval confidence compared to some peer destinations.

UK Stydy Visa.png

Source Country Breakdown: Growth and Decline Patterns

The UK’s international student pipeline is shaped by an evolving mix of source countries, each responding differently to policy shifts, affordability, and global competition. 2024 marked a watershed year as longstanding trends were disrupted by the ban on dependants, inflationary pressures, and increasing scrutiny of international migration figures.

India and Nigeria: The Hardest Hit

India and Nigeria were the two most impacted markets in 2024, not due to waning interest in UK education, but because of their high dependence on family accompaniment as part of the study-abroad decision. For many students from these regions, particularly married postgraduate taught (PGT) applicants, the ability to bring a spouse or children significantly influenced destination choice.

India had risen to become the UK’s largest source of international students by 2022, with over 143,000 visas issued. However, following the 2024 policy change, Indian study visas fell sharply to 90,000, a 26% drop year-on-year and a 36% drop from 2022 levels. This decline directly correlates with the family restriction, as the majority of Indian students were enrolled in one-year master’s programs and frequently applied with dependants.

Nigeria, meanwhile, saw a precipitous drop of 56% in 2024, with visa numbers falling from 43,000 to just 18,900. Nigerian students historically brought the highest number of dependants per main applicant. In some universities, for every 100 Nigerian students, there were over 70 dependants in tow. The policy shift not only deterred prospective students but also cast a shadow of uncertainty over the UK’s openness to family-centric student populations.

For both India and Nigeria, the impact was not just numerical, it was financial. Institutions heavily reliant on these markets, particularly post-1992 universities with large PGT cohorts, faced shortfalls in tuition revenue and accommodation occupancy.

Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh: The Quiet Climbers

Amid the broader decline, several countries emerged as unexpected growth drivers.

Nepal stood out with a remarkable 61% increase in main applicant study visas between 2023 and 2024, climbing from approximately 17,800 to 28,600. This trend reflects a shifting perception among Nepali students who see the UK as a more stable, prestigious alternative to Australia (which tightened visa conditions in 2023) and Canada (which implemented a cap). Unlike Indian students, Nepali applicants generally do not bring dependants, making them less vulnerable to the 2024 policy change.

Pakistan, despite its historically moderate dependant ratio, demonstrated resilience. Visa issuance increased slightly to 22,500 in 2024, up 7% from the previous year. This growth may also be supported by relatively low visa refusal rates and positive word-of-mouth from returning alumni. Additionally, UK institutions that had previously overlooked Pakistan in favor of India or Bangladesh began redirecting recruitment efforts to stabilize enrollment numbers.

Bangladesh showed modest growth (+6%) and remains an underutilized market with untapped potential. However, visa refusal rates from Bangladesh remain higher than the global average, which could be improved with stronger agent vetting and institutional outreach.

China: Stable But Losing Momentum

China continues to be a key pillar in UK international student enrollment, but its growth has stagnated. In 2024, the UK issued approximately 103,000 study visas to Chinese nationals—a 6% decrease from 2023. While the drop is not as steep as India or Nigeria, it reflects broader geopolitical caution and increased competition from the US and Australia, where Chinese student flows remain robust.

Importantly, Chinese students rarely bring dependants, which protected them from the effects of the 2024 ban. However, economic uncertainty in China and shifting youth sentiment toward Western education, especially among undergraduate cohorts, may cause further contraction unless re-engagement strategies are deployed.

Visa Trends by Country (2022–2024)

Country 2022 2023 2024 YoY % Change
India

143,000

122,000

90,000

-26%

Nigeria

59,000

43,000

18,900

-56%

China

116,000

109,000

103,000

-6%

Nepal

15,300

17,800

28,600

+61%

Pakistan

23,500

21,000

22,500

+7%

Bangladesh

13,200

13,800

14,600

+6%

Let’s take a closer look at the data:

student visia output 2 e1744807537270.png

MSM Monitor Insight:

The sharp segmentation across source countries reinforces the need for the UK to de-risk its market dependency. While India and Nigeria will remain essential to the long-term strategy, more balanced recruitment from emerging markets like Nepal, Kenya, Sri Lanka, and Ghana can serve as a shock absorber against policy disruptions.

Student Housing Crisis: A Structural Limitation

While visa policy garners headlines, one of the most critical yet under-addressed barriers to international student growth in the UK is the chronic shortage of affordable housing. In 2024–25, this issue evolved from a temporary concern into a systemic constraint, particularly for students from price-sensitive source markets.

The Scale of the Problem

According to the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) and Unipol, the UK faces a projected shortfall of approximately 450,000 student beds by the end of 2025. This deficit is especially acute in major student cities like London, Manchester, Bristol, Edinburgh, and Birmingham—many of which are simultaneously battling housing affordability crises among local populations.

While domestic students may have the option to live at home or share long-term leases, international students—often arriving alone and unfamiliar with UK housing markets—depend heavily on institutional accommodation or purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA).

The supply-demand imbalance has driven rents to all-time highs:

Who’s Paying the Price?

Students from high-growth yet price-sensitive markets—such as Bangladesh, Kenya, Ghana, and Pakistan—are particularly affected. Even among Indian and Nigerian students, anecdotal evidence suggests an increase in deferrals or withdrawals due to unaffordable housing offers. In one survey conducted by Save the Student (2024), 42% of international students indicated that housing costs were the primary factor influencing their choice of institution or country.

Moreover, the housing crisis has had knock-on effects:

Supply Constraints

Several factors contribute to the undersupply:

Universities are caught in a bind—unable to meet student housing needs on-campus, yet facing mounting pressure to cap recruitment in the absence of housing guarantees.

average uk student rent output 3 e1744807641805.png

Government and Institutional Responses

While some local councils and institutions have attempted interventions, the pace has been slow and patchy. Measures currently under discussion or in early-stage rollout include:

Still, systemic change is needed. MSM Monitor advocates for:

MSM Monitor Insight:

Housing has become the new visa bottleneck—a silent enrollment cap that undermines the UK’s competitiveness. Unless addressed in tandem with immigration reform, it risks throttling growth from both new and returning students. Institutions must integrate housing strategy into their internationalization plans, or risk losing students not to visas—but to rent.

Geopolitical Competition: The Global Landscape

The UK’s position in the global higher education market is increasingly shaped by developments in peer destination countries, especially Canada, Australia, and the United States. As of 2024–25, the competitive landscape is in flux, with each of the “Big Four” grappling with domestic pressures, policy resets, and market expectations. For UK institutions and policymakers, it is crucial to understand these shifts—not only to benchmark performance but to strategically reposition the UK as a stable, high-quality alternative.

Canada: From Open Leader to Policy Tightening

Until recently, Canada had emerged as a favored destination for international students, particularly from India, Nigeria, and Latin America. Between 2017 and 2022, the number of international students in Canada doubled. This growth was driven by a relatively open visa regime, generous post-study work opportunities, and a reputation for student safety.

However, in 2023–24, Canadian policymakers implemented a drastic policy correction. Citing pressure on housing markets, healthcare systems, and immigration infrastructure, Canada introduced a cap on international study permits for 2024 and 2025, limiting post-secondary approvals to approximately 437,000 annually. This is projected to lead to a 35–40% reduction in approved permits compared to 2022 volumes.

Key changes include:

The result: A large number of prospective students have been deferred or redirected to other countries. For the UK, this presents both an opportunity and a cautionary tale. While Canada’s slowdown may shift demand elsewhere, it also reflects the growing importance of managing public perception and infrastructure readiness.

Australia: Quality Over Quantity

Australia has long been a key competitor for the UK, especially in attracting students from Asia-Pacific and South Asia. In 2024, however, Australia adopted a more selective international education stance. The Department of Home Affairs raised financial thresholds, increased English proficiency requirements, and slowed down visa processing for low-tier institutions.

Student visa approvals declined by over 26% in 2024 compared to the previous year. The Australian government has explicitly stated that it is moving toward a “quality over quantity” framework, aiming to reduce misuse of student visas as migration pathways.

While Australia’s high QS-ranked universities continue to perform well, private colleges and pathway providers have reported significant declines. The UK, if seen as more consistent and transparent, could capitalize on this moment, particularly in markets like Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka where students are reassessing destination choices.

United States: Stability With Caveats

The U.S. remains the world’s largest destination for international students, hosting over 950,000 students annually. In 2024, U.S. visa issuance remained stable, with no major restrictive policy changes. The Optional Practical Training (OPT) pathway continues to be a significant draw, particularly for STEM students who are eligible for three-year post-study work.

However, the U.S. faces two challenges:

Despite these factors, the U.S. is increasingly viewed as a “safe bet” due to its large research ecosystem and abundant job market.

Global Comparison Table (2024–25)

Country 2024 Visa Volume Key Policy Changes Market Signal
Canada
~437,000

Cap introduced; higher financial proof; PGWP limits

Restrictive

Australia
~400,000

Slowed processing; tightened English/financial norms

Selective

United States
~950,000

Stable visa system; OPT retained

Expensive but open

United Kingdom

~393,000

Dependant ban; inflation concerns

Moderately stable

The UK remains in a relatively favorable position as of early 2025—less restrictive than Canada and Australia, yet more affordable than the U.S. However, this edge is fragile. Visa policy volatility and infrastructure gaps, such as housing shortages, could erode the UK’s advantage quickly if not managed proactively.

Strategic Considerations

MSM Monitor Insight

The UK has a narrow window to reposition itself as the most predictable and student-welcoming destination among major players. This requires consistency in messaging, coordination across institutional and governmental bodies, and real-time market intelligence to respond to policy shifts in other countries. Failing to act now risks allowing competitors to regain lost ground or recast the UK as unstable—a perception that could reverse current gains.

Post-Brexit Recalibration: Shifting Geographies and Strategic Trade-offs

The United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union marked one of the most significant geopolitical transitions in recent British history. While Brexit was primarily framed as a matter of sovereignty and immigration control, its impact on the UK’s higher education sector—particularly international student mobility—has been both immediate and far-reaching.

From EU Privilege to International Parity

Before Brexit, students from the European Union benefited from streamlined access to UK universities. They were exempt from visa requirements, paid the same tuition as domestic students, and had unfettered access to the UK job market after graduation.

However, following the implementation of the new post-Brexit immigration system in 2021, EU students were reclassified as international applicants. This reclassification resulted in:

These changes effectively removed the frictionless access EU students previously enjoyed. The outcome was swift and measurable: between 2020 and 2023, EU student enrollments dropped by 53%, according to data from HESA. Some institutions, particularly those with a strong historical draw from Western Europe, reported even steeper declines.

A New Landscape: The Rise of Non-EU Markets

As the EU pipeline contracted, UK universities ramped up efforts to expand recruitment from non-EU markets, particularly in South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and parts of Southeast Asia. Between 2020 and 2022, the share of non-EU international students in total new enrollments rose from 65% to nearly 85%, driven largely by India, Nigeria, Pakistan, and China.

This rebalancing created new financial opportunities, as non-EU students often pay higher fees and pursue postgraduate programs that contribute more per capita revenue. However, it also introduced new risks:

Moreover, many EU students had historically enrolled in undergraduate programs—offering three or four years of steady tuition and the possibility of integration into UK labor markets post-graduation. In contrast, many new non-EU students opt for one-year master’s programs, compressing the revenue timeline and adding pressure to constantly replenish the recruitment pipeline.

Rebuilding EU Confidence

While most Brexit-related education policies are now entrenched, opportunities still exist to regain lost EU market share. MSM Monitor recommends the following institutional and policy actions:

EU vs Non-EU International Student Enrollments (2018–2024)

Year EU Enrollments Non-EU Enrollments EU % of Total
2018
139,000

285,000

33%

2020
120,000

375,000

24%

2022
77,000

505,000

13%

2024

65,000 (est.)

540,000 (est.)

11%

Source: HESA, 2024 projections

Let’s take a closer look:

number student enrolled output 4 e1744807738687.png

MSM Monitor Insight

Post-Brexit, the UK has pivoted toward high-growth international markets, but at the cost of losing historically stable, low-risk EU enrollments. While the shift has been financially beneficial in the short term, the long-term strategic calculus favors a more balanced portfolio. Institutions should not only diversify geographically, but also by program duration and academic level to ensure sustainable growth across market cycles.

With the political climate stabilizing and the economic case for UK degrees still strong in Western Europe, there is a clear window to rebuild trust and regain lost ground in the EU—especially at the undergraduate level.

Strategic Recommendations & MSM Monitor Conclusion

As the UK’s international education sector adjusts to a post-pandemic, post-Brexit, and policy-shifting world, 2024 emerged as a year of recalibration. While the downturn in visa issuance reflected structural and regulatory disruptions, early 2025 data suggests stabilization is possible—if the right interventions are made swiftly and strategically.

Drawing from this analysis, MSM Monitor outlines six core recommendations for institutions and policymakers to future-proof UK international student mobility.

1. Diversify Recruitment Across Commonwealth and Emerging Markets

The over-concentration of international student recruitment from a handful of countries has proven to be a liability in the face of policy changes. The 2024 dependant ban revealed how quickly demand from India and Nigeria could contract. Institutions must now actively:

Diversification should also include greater program range, academic levels (UG/PG), and delivery models to match different income segments and preferences.

2. Address Student Housing as a Strategic Priority

Student accommodation has transitioned from a support service to a core determinant of institutional competitiveness. Without adequate and affordable housing, institutions may face capped intakes—regardless of visa success.

MSM Monitor recommends:

An institution’s ability to provide housing certainty will increasingly define its ability to enroll and retain international students.

3. Rebuild Confidence in Postgraduate Taught (PGT) Pathways

The ban on dependants disproportionately affected one-year taught Master’s programs, especially in business, computing, and health sciences. To rebuild this segment, institutions should:

While dependants may remain restricted for the foreseeable future, PGT can regain appeal if positioned correctly as a career accelerator rather than a migration pathway.

4. Preserve and Strengthen the Graduate Route

The Graduate Route remains the UK’s most valuable competitive advantage in the global higher education market. It serves not only as a post-study incentive but also as a pipeline into the UK’s skilled labor force.

Policymakers must:

Destabilizing this route through speculation or rhetoric could undo progress made over the past three years.

5. Rebalance the EU–Non-EU Strategy Post-Brexit

Brexit created a strategic blind spot by shifting attention entirely away from EU student recruitment. Rebalancing this equation is essential for portfolio stability.

Recommended actions include:

A modest recovery in EU enrollments can offer long-term academic and financial stability to complement high-growth, higher-risk non-EU markets.

6. Compete Proactively in a Shifting Global Landscape

The global education market is being reshaped in real time. Canada’s cap, Australia’s tightening, and the U.S.’s steady cost increases present a unique moment for the UK to reposition itself as the most balanced destination—combining quality, stability, and opportunity.

To do so, institutions and government must:

This is a window of opportunity—but one that will close if competitors reset faster or offer more student-friendly reforms in 2025–26.

MSM Monitor Conclusion

The UK’s international student visa downturn in 2024 was not a collapse—it was a correction. Triggered by specific policy shifts and compounded by structural weaknesses, the dip in visa issuance revealed deep dependencies and exposed blind spots in infrastructure and market strategy. However, it also forced introspection—and in doing so, created a blueprint for a more balanced, sustainable, and globally competitive model.

The early signs of recovery in 2025 are encouraging. With 411,100 study visas already granted by January, the sector appears poised to regain momentum. But sustaining this trajectory will require more than passive optimism. It will demand alignment across universities, government, and private stakeholders to address root challenges: housing, affordability, policy clarity, and geographic over-reliance.

MSM Monitor believes the UK still holds a leading edge in global education—but that edge is fragile. Rebuilding must be intentional, data-informed, and student-centric.

Institutions that act now—diversifying their markets, investing in student support, and preserving trust—will not only recover lost ground but define the next decade of growth in international education.